Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Edmundo Pardo Rubi v. Patrick K. O'Toole
as 2:2011cv06695
Defendant:
Cynthia G Aaron, Jan M Adler, Edwin Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Edmundo Pardo Rubi
Panico v. Thermea et al
as 3:2011cv02378
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Miles Industries Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Melissa Panico and Sean Whelan
Defendant:
Baxi Group and BDR Thermea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Whelan v. BDR Thermea et al
as 3:2011cv02146
Plaintiff:
Sean Whelan
Defendant:
BDR Thermea, Baxi Group and Miles Industries Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Whelan et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2011cv00986
Plaintiff:
Shirley Whelan and Robert Whelan
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Foster Wheeler LLC, General Dynamics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Whelan et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 4:2011cv00986
Plaintiff:
Shirley Whelan and Robert Whelan
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Foster Wheeler LLC, General Dynamics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Whelan v. Kelly Harrington
as 2:2011cv01628
Respondent:
Kelly Harrington
Petitioner:
Timothy Whelan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02572
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
