Cases 31 - 40 of 2,206
Mason v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Mack Mason
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Choate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-1257
Petitioner:
STEPHEN LEE CHOATE
Respondent:
WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Abbott v. Williams, et al.
as 24-999
Petitioner:
DAVID ROY ABBOTT
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Smith v. Howell, et al.
as 24-857
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER O. SMITH
Respondent:
JERRY HOWELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and RONALD OLIVER, Substituted per [92] Order for Jerry Howell
Polk v. Wolfson et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Renard Truman Polk
Respondent:
Steven B. Wolfson and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmiston v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-786
Petitioner:
JUSTIN EDMISTON
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
McDaniel v. Garrett et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Nicholas McDaniel
Respondent:
Timothy Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilmore v. Deputy Chief Hass et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Corves K. Gilmore
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Respondent:
Deputy Chief Hass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King-Hardiman v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-598
Petitioner:
ANDRE KING-HARDIMAN
Respondent:
NETHANJAH BREITENBACH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Marquez v. Frazier, et al.
as 24-578
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHNNY A. MARQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
FERNANDIES FRAZIER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Respondent:
RENEE BAKER and TIM GARRETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
