Cases 31 - 40 of 103
Paul Dunfee v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2018cv02184
Defendant:
Jeff Stone, Riverside County Sheriff Department, William Di Yorio and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Dunfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Snyder v. Riverside County, et al
as 18-55887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA FRANKLIN SNYDER
Defendant - Appellee:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Public Entity, in its official capacity, STAN SNIFF, Sheriff, in his individual capacity, KEVIN JEFFRIES, Board of Supervisor, in his individual capacity and others
Jeffrey Issler, Jr. v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2018cv01020
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, John Benoit, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Issler, Jr.
Joshua Stoll v. Riverside County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2017cv02408
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, John Benoit, William Di Yorio and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stoll
Manuel Burruel III v. Stanley Sniff et al
as 5:2017cv02350
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, Marion Ashley, John J. Benoit and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Burruel, III
Manuel Burruel v. Pam Ahlin et al
as 5:2017cv02248
Respondent:
Pam Ahlin, Marion Ashley, John J Benoit and others
Petitioner:
Manuel Burruel, III
Burruel v. Ahlin et al
as 1:2017cv01442
Plaintiff:
Manuel Burruel, III
Defendant:
Pam Ahlin, John Hupka, Timothy F. Salz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith A. Pepito v. Riverside County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2017cv02128
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, John Benoit, Kevin Jefferies and others
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Pepito
Austin John Smith v. County of Riverside Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2017cv01969
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, Board of Supervisors John Benoit, County of Riverside Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Austin John Smith
Armando B. Sanchez v. Riverside County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2017cv01517
Defendant:
Marion Ashley, John Benoit, William Di Yorio and others
Plaintiff:
Armando B. Sanchez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
