Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01793
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lori Koff v. Bloomingdales Inc et al
as 8:2012cv00164
Defendant:
Bloomingdales Inc and DOES
Plaintiff:
Lori Koff
The Estate of James J. Marshall v. John Varvatos of California, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv06702
Plaintiff:
The Estate of James J. Marshall
Defendant:
John Varvatos of California, Inc., John Varvatos Enterprises, Inc., John Varvatos and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
VolumeCocomo Apparel Inc v. Guess Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06694
Defendant:
Bloomingdales Inc, Dillards Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
VolumeCocomo Apparel Inc
Bensi et al v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.
as 3:2011cv03968
Plaintiff:
Paul Bensi , Bart Florence , Lyle Setter and others
Defendant:
Bloomingdale's, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Fatemeh Johnmohammadi v. Bloomingdales Inc et al
as 2:2011cv06434
Defendant:
Bloomingdales Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Fatemeh Johnmohammadi
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Anna-Stina et al
as 2:2010cv09075
Defendant:
Anna-Stina, Bloomingdales Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Nancy Vitolo v. Bloomingdale's Inc et al
as 2:2009cv07728
Plaintiff:
Nancy Vitolo, Nancy Vitolo, Nancy Vitolo and others
Defendant:
Bloomingdale's Inc, Macy's Inc, Macy's Department Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc et al
as 2:2007cv04958
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P
Defendant:
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc, Macy's Inc, Macy's Inc and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
International Business Machines Corp and Xerox Global Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
