Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Frank Cockrell v. Muntz
as 10-55048
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANK B. COCKRELL
Respondent - Appellee:
MUNTZ, Acting Warden
Cockrell v. Haviland
as 2:2009cv02246
Petitioner:
Richard Cockrell
Respondent:
John W. Haviland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanford v. Cockrell
as 2:2009cv02205
Plaintiff:
Bruce F. Stanford
Defendant:
Robert L. Cockrell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Frank Coyd Cockrell II v. Muntz
as 5:2009cv01337
Plaintiff:
Frank Boyd Cockrell, II
Defendant:
Muntz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Orthola, Inc et al v. Cockrell Orthopaedics, Inc et al
as 2:2009cv04385
Plaintiff:
Orthola, Inc, Orthola, Inc, Cockrell Orthopaedics, Inc and others
Defendant:
Stryker Orthopaedics, Howmedica Osteonics Corp, Howmedica Osteonics Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Type:
Contract
Frank Boyd Cockrell v. Acting Warden Muntz et al
as 5:2009cv01100
Plaintiff:
Frank Boyd Cockrell, II
Defendant:
Muntz, Muntz, Sapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Cockrell v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2008cv00259
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Cockrell
Defendant:
W. J. Sullivan, - Avalos and Director of CDCR
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cockrell, et al v. Bradbury, et al
as 08-55163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK B. COCKRELL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL BRADBURY, VINCENT J. O'NEILL, Jr., COUNTY OF VENTURA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cockrell v. Praxair Distribution Inc.
as 3:2008cv00204
Plaintiff:
Seth Cockrell
Defendant:
Praxair Distribution Inc. and Praxair Distribution Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Frank B Cockrell v. Michael Bradbury
as 2:2007cv06971
Plaintiff:
Frank B Cockrell, II
Defendant:
Michael Bradbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
