Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Patrick Smrz v. Correctional Medical Services, et al
as 09-35812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK EDWARD SMRZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and - KEMPER, Dr.
Daniel Peterson v. Mary Hicks, et al
as 09-35776
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL L. PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY HICKS, Nurse Practitioner and employee of CMS, APRIL DAWSON, a medical doctor and employee of CMS, JON ERIC BAILEY, a medical doctor and Director of CMS and others
Goodrick v. Sandy et al
as 3:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, Jay Nielsen, Carolyn Meline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Hanslovan v. Randy Blades, et al
as 09-35662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY HANSLOVAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., APRIL DAWSON and others
Thomas Coffelt v. Dawson, et al
as 09-35637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS J. COFFELT
Defendant - Appellee:
DAWSON, Doctor and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES
Brady v. Reinke et al
as 1:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Billy Eugene Brady
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Zarah Martin, Randy Blades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2009cv00304
Plaintiff:
Marlin Riggs
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuvaas v. Correctional Medical Services
as 2:2009cv01033
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kuvaas
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Aldrin et al
as 1:2009cv00211
Petitioner:
Jack Campbell
Respondent:
- Aldrin, Johanna Smith and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snodgrass v. Correctional Medical Services Inc.
as 1:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Snodgrass
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
