Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Jeffrey Keyes v. D. Samuels et al
as 2:2022cv03422
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Keyes
Defendant:
D. Samuels, N. Gaughan, M. Ayon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Crawford v. D. Samuel
as 2:2022cv03123
Petitioner:
John Crawford
Respondent:
D. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy D. Wilkins v. D. Samuels et al
as 2:2022cv02434
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
D. Samuels, B. Phillips, S. Wilhite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Valerio v. D. Samuels
as 2:2022cv01733
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Valerio
Defendant:
D. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas R. Bray v. D. Samuels et al
as 5:2022cv00347
Petitioner:
Douglas R Bray
Respondent:
D Samuels and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Ronald Gene Robinson v. Excel Sharrieff et al
as 2:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Robinson
Defendant:
Excel Sharrieff, John Denvir, S. Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Lamaar Wooley v. D. Samuel
as 2:2022cv00495
Petitioner:
Gary Lamaar Wooley
Respondent:
D. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman Keith Young v. D. Samuel
as 2:2021cv07804
Petitioner:
Norman Keith Young
Respondent:
D. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Allen v. Samuel
as 1:2021cv01088
Petitioner:
Clarence Ray Allen
Respondent:
D. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kohen Uhuru v. Jim Bonnifield, et al
as 21-55136
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK MOLONEY, license No. 181536, individual/official capacity, R. GOMEZ, CCI, individual/official capacity, J. STECK, Correctional Captain, individual/official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Diallo Dynomite, AKA Diallo Earl Uhuru
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
