Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Sanders v. Cate et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00891
Petitioner: David D. Sanders
Respondent: Matthew Cate and Darrell Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samael Gomez v. Darrel Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00829
Respondent: Darrel Adams
Petitioner: Samael Gomez
Collin Davis v. Darrell Adams
as 2:2010cv00695
Respondent: Darrell Adams
Petitioner: Collin Davis
Williams v. Rodriguez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01882
Plaintiff: Lonnie Williams
Defendant: P. Rodriguez, Darrell Adams, Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lia v. California Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv04259
Plaintiff: Michael Lia
Respondent: California Department of Corrections and Darrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vera v. Adams
as 3:2009cv01544
Petitioner: Guillermo Vera
Respondent: Darrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muharem Kurbegovich v. Unknown FBI Agents et al
as 2:2009cv04001
Plaintiff: Muharem Kurbegovich
Defendant: Unknown FBI Agents, Matthew L. Cate and Darrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Smith v. Adams
as 3:2009cv01187
Petitioner: Eric Lamar Smith
Respondent: Darrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moriel v. Adams
as 3:2009cv01176
Petitioner: Adolph Verdugo Moriel
Respondent: Darrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Adams
as 3:2009cv01113
Petitioner: Eric Lamar Smith
Respondent: Darrel Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?