Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 466
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Burbank Rogers Place I, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02016
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: BURBANK ROGERS PLACE I, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. The Marq Apartments, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01342
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: THE MARQ APARTMENTS, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. J.P. Allen Company, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01500
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: J.P. ALLEN COMPANY, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African Asian Abilities Club et al v. 303 West Glenoaks Boulevard Apartments, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01502
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African Asian Abilites Club
Defendant: 303 WEST GLENOAKS BOULEVARD APARTMENTS, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Cedar Regency, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01477
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie James Davis IV
Defendant: Cedar Regency LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African Asian Abilities Club et al v. Hunt Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02261
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: HUNT ENTERPRISES, INC., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Halt-Ten Harvard, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02263
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: HALT-TEN HARVARD, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Galleria Villas LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01499
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant: GALLERIA VILLAS LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Judy Jaye Barber et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02014
Defendant: Judy Jaye Barber, Judith Jaye Barber, Stephen C. Barber and others
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie James Davis IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club v. Grismer Avenue Properties, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv02018
Plaintiff: United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie James Davis IV
Defendant: Grismer Avenue Properties, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?