Cases 31 - 40 of 206
O'Neal v. Minev et al
as 2:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Charles O'Neal
Defendant:
Michael Minev, James Dzuranda, SDCC Nurse Practitioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snook v. Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Troy Snook and Troy Allon Snook
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Julie Williams, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meadows v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Julie Williams, AW Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Minev et al
as 2:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Charles Neal
Defendant:
Dr. Michael Minev, T. Manalang and S. Omandac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Minev
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Gary Lewis
Defendant:
Michael Minev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Bailey v. Michael Minev, et al
as 23-15792
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MINEV, Medical Director, JAMES MCLOWE, DIRECTOR OF NURSING, High Desert State Prison and others
Bolin v. Kohn et al
as 3:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bolin
Defendant:
Kohn, Greg Martin, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 23-15466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ammar Harris v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 23-15347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., MICHAEL MINEV and others
Ammar Harris v. F. Dreesen, et al
as 23-15467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
F. DREESEN, MORIN, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
