Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Hudson et al v. Vitol, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03217
Defendant:
SK Energy Americas, Inc., SK Trading International Co. Ltd. and Vitol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Hudson and Elizabeth Gendron
Interested Party:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc., Vincent Cendejas, Justin Lardinois and others
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Vanessa Long v. SK Energy Americas Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv04266
Defendant:
SK Trading International Co. Ltd., Vitol Inc. and SK Energy Americas Inc.
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Long
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Fricke-Parks Press, Inc. et al v. SK Energy Americas, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03148
Plaintiff:
Fricke-Parks Press, Inc., Justin Lardinois and Vincent Cendejas
Defendant:
SK Energy Americas, Inc., Vitol Inc., SK Trading International Co. LTD. and others
Interested Party:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2020cv03131
Plaintiff:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc., Bogard Construction, Inc., Vincent Cendejas and others
Defendant:
SK Trading International Co. Ltd., SK Energy Americas, Inc., Vitol Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Craig Kelly, Carpe Carma, LLC, Marie E. Richardson and others
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California, All Parties, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Vitol Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Federico Corteggiano and Vitol Inc.
Plaintiff:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Export Development Canada v. Whole Energy Fuels Corporation et al
as 2:2016mc00155
Plaintiff:
Export Development Canada
Defendant:
Whole Energy Fuels Corporation
Garnishee:
Vitol Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
