Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Randolph Garaux v. USDC-CAFR
as 11-72197
:
In re: RANDOLPH E. GARAUX
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH E. GARAUX
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
MATTHEW CATE, JAMES A. YATES, C. HUCKABAY and others
Randall Grimes v. Arron Pfiel, et al
as 11-56055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL WAYNE GRIMES
Defendant - Appellee:
ARRON PFIEL, Correctional Officer and ARMANDO H. MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer
Kenaz Dumah Parker v. James A. Yates, et al.
as 1:2011cv00802
Plaintiff:
Kenaz Dumah Parker
Defendant:
James A. Yates, F. Igbinosa, David I. Rohrdanz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toth v. Schwarzenegger, et al.
as 1:2011cv00247
Plaintiff:
R.C. Toth
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew L. Cate, James Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Leonard Johnson
Defendant:
Pleasant Valley State Prison, California Department of Corrections, James Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francisco Gil v. James Yates, et al
as 11-15266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCISCO J. GIL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, J. WOODEND, M. C. DAVIS and others
Barry Jameson et al v. John Marshall et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Defendant:
Belton, Belton, P D Brazelton and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Jameson
Garaux vs. Cate, et al.
as 1:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
Randolph E. Garaux
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, James A. Yates, C. Huckabay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toth v. Bridges et al
as 1:2009cv01813
Plaintiff:
Robert Toth
Defendant:
Bridges, James Yates, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toth v. Cate et al
as 1:2009cv01432
Plaintiff:
R. Toth
Defendant:
Mathew Cate, C. Huckabay, C Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
