Cases 41 - 50 of 2,623
Emanuel v. Silber et al
as 2:2024cv01340
Defendant:
Bean, P. Hernandez, Drummond and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Ray Emanuel Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Completo et al v. Richman Property Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04233
Defendant:
Richman Property Services, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Brittany Rasp, Steven Completo, Gregory Rasp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
(PS) Bisi et al v. Cooke et al
as 2:2024cv01444
Defendant:
Scott Cooke and Toyota Financial Services
Plaintiff:
Laurie Bisi and Gregory Bisi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kern v. Drummond et al
as 3:2024cv00238
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke and David Drummond
Plaintiff:
Stephen R.F. Kern, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-4255
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner:
SEANTAIN COOK
Benshoof, et al. v. Admon, et al.
as 24-4223
Defendant:
BLAIR RUSS, WILLIE GREGORY, MAGALIE LERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
BRIANA GAGE and KURT BENSHOOF
Ackerman v. Cooke et al
as 2:2024cv01233
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, William Ruebart, Warden William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Defendant:
William A Gittere, Kenneth L. Williams, Brian Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00239
Defendant:
P. Hernandez, W. Reubart, L. Lucas and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Cooke et al
as 2:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Kelvin L. James
Defendant:
Madelyn Ackens, Tasheena Cooke and Jennifer Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
