Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 196
James Decker v. Mike Knowles, et al
as 10-15042
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES RICHARD DECKER
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Lyralisa Stevens v. Mike Knowle
as 10-55009
Plaintiff - Appellant: LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES
Elonza Tyler v. Mike Knowle
as 09-57041
Petitioner - Appellant: ELONZA JESSE TYLER
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES, Warden
Higbee v. Knowles, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2004cv01820
Petitioner: Anthony Higbee
Respondent: Mike Knowles , Board of Prison Terms and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas Hightower v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-80182
Plaintiff - Petitioner: THOMAS A. HIGHTOWER
Defendant - Respondent: ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, EDWARD S. ALEMEDIA, N. GRANNIS and others
Bunyard v. Knowles We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2003cv01280
Petitioner: John P. Bunyard
Respondent: Mike Knowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tomas Sanchez v. A. Kane, et al
as 09-17703
Petitioner - Appellant: TOMAS F. SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee: A. P. KANE, BEN CURRY and MIKE KNOWLES
Chung Kao v. Mike Knowles, et al
as 09-17565
Petitioner - Appellant: CHUNG KAO
Respondent - Appellee: MIKE KNOWLES, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Norsworthy v. Cate, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02989
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Bryan Norsworthy
Defendant: Mathew Cate, Mike Knowles, Kathleen Dickinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ariel Ramirez, Jr. v. Mike Knowle
as 09-73338
Petitioner: ARIEL RAMIREZ, Jr.
Respondent: MIKE KNOWLES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?