Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Billy R Hill v. Saxon Mortgage Services Inc et al
as 8:2010cv00141
Defendant:
Does and Saxon Mortgage Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Billy R Hill
Real v. Walker et al
as 2:2009cv03273
Plaintiff:
Randy Real
Defendant:
James Walker, R. Hill, T. Virga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. State of California
as 3:2009cv03147
Petitioner:
Chazarus R. Hill, Sr.
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Zamudio, et al
as 2:2009cv01523
Plaintiff:
Devonte B Harris
Defendant:
L. Zamudio, James Walker, R. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Walker et al
as 2:2008cv01990
Plaintiff:
Sidney Anderson
Defendant:
J Walker, R. Hill, G - Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Walker, et al
as 2:2008cv01838
Plaintiff:
Sidney Anderson
Defendant:
J Walker, R. Hill, G - Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shade et al v. Judicial Counsel of the State of California et al
as 3:2008cv02563
Plaintiff:
Ross S. Shade and Mary C. Shade
Defendant:
Judicial Counsel of the State of California, Ronald M. George, Marvin R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shade et al v. Judicial Counsel of the State of California et al
as 4:2008cv02563
Plaintiff:
Ross S. Shade and Mary C. Shade
Defendant:
Judicial Counsel of the State of California, Ronald M. George, Marvin R. Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2008cv00364
Petitioner:
Jan R. Hill
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armstrong v. Curry et al
as 5:2007cv06377
Plaintiff:
Andrew Emil Armstrong
Defendant:
B. Curry, N. Grannis, J. F. Aboytes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
