Cases 41 - 50 of 1,323
Lux v. Kelly
as 23-4019
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVAN P. LUX
Respondent / Appellee:
BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent of OSP
Lee v. Andrewjeski, et al.
as 23-3924
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL KALAMI LEE
Respondent / Appellee:
MELISSA ANDREWJESKI, SUPERINTENDENT and BOB FERGUSON
Middlekauff v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01817
Petitioner:
Darrell Kelly Middlekauff, Sr.
Respondent:
Superintendent Erin Reyes and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talmadge v. Houser
as 23-3898
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRETT ALAN JAMES TALMADGE
Respondent / Appellee:
EARL HOUSER, SUPERINTENDENT
Slaikeu v. Mcclenahan, et al.
as 23-3904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER SLAIKEU
Defendant / Appellee:
MCCLENAHAN, Sgt., L. DEBOARD, Sgt., JAMES MILBURN, Superintendant and others
Slaikeu v. Mcclenahan, et al.
as 23-3902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER SLAIKEU
Defendant / Appellee:
MCCLENAHAN, Sgt., L. DEBOARD, Sgt., JAMES MILBURN, Superintendant and others
Slaikeu, et al. v. Deboard, et al.
as 23-3897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ALEXANDER SLAIKEU
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOCKWOOD, KENNETH ADAMS and DEREK ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
L. DEBOARD, Sgt. Superintendent, J. BROWN, Superintendant I, PHEASANT, Sgt. and others
Recinos v. State of Washington, et al.
as 23-3824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIFFANY DION RECINOS
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, CLIFF FRIES, Principal, MATT CARLSON and others
Watts v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Michael Watts
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, J. Quick, C. Jourdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellam-Meriwether v. Reyes
as 2:2023cv01778
Petitioner:
John Ellam-Meriwether
Respondent:
Superintendent Erin Reyes and Erin Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
