Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Seely v. Foster et al
as 3:2016cv00020
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Pam DelPorto, Sheryl Foster and others
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seely v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00118
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pike v. Seely
as 1:2014cv00370
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Pike
Defendant:
Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv01830
Plaintiff:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Lori D. Zamora, Kyle Seely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shea v. U.S. WCSU
as 3:2014cv00354
Defendant:
Arias, Barboza, Bomer and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gregory Shea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Seely v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 14-16162
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NDOC BOARD OF PRISON COMMISSIONERS, BRIAN SANDOVAL and others
Seely et al v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00237
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Catherine Cortez-Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Andre' D. Boston, J. Castro, D. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salvador Solis v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 13-56256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALVADOR SOLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, J. CLARK KELSO, Federal Receiver/Medical, K. SEELY and others
Chennault v. Morris et al
as 3:2013cv00854
Plaintiff:
Steve W. Chennault
Defendant:
Morris, R. Campbell, N. Ridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seely v. Walsh et al
as 3:2013cv00152
Defendant:
M. McBroom, M. Navarro and Lisa Walsh
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
