Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Benson v. Peters et al
as 2:2014cv00132
Defendant:
Cpl. Akers, B. Anana, Archer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Benson Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negash v. Franke
as 2:2014cv00106
Respondent:
Steve Franke
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Samuel Mesghena Negash
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeArmitt v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2014cv00060
Defendant:
Cpl. Vincent Beerbower, Capt. Steven Boston, Sgt. Keith Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Clyde DeArmitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairley v. Shelton et al
as 2:2014cv00030
Defendant:
Kenneth Becker, Daniel Dewsnup, C. DiGiulio and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Fairley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott Jones v. Steve Franke
as 13-36202
Petitioner - Appellee:
SCOTT DOUGLAS JONES
Respondent - Appellant:
STEVE FRANKE
Leonel Martinez v. Colette Peters, et al
as 13-36195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONEL O. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, of O.D.O.C., JEFF PREMO, Supt., O.S.P., M. YODER, Asst. Supt., of Security O.S.P. and others
Darius Pittman v. Steve Franke
as 13-36172
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARIUS PITTMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE FRANKE
Leonel Martinez v. Colette Peters, et al
as 13-80218
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
LEONEL O. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, of O.D.O.C., JEFF PREMO, Supt., O.S.P., M. YODER, Asst. Supt., of Security O.S.P. and others
Robert Woodroffe v. John Kitzhaber, et al
as 13-35986
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT C. WOODROFFE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. KITZHABER, JOHN R. KROGER, BRENDA COUGHENHOWER and others
James Jones v. Steve Franke
as 13-35806
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES LOUIS JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE FRANKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
