Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Trim et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 3:2009cv04160
Plaintiff:
Paul Trim, Darryl Johnson, Debra Furney and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jacquie A Figg et al v. The City of Fontana et al
as 5:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
Jacquie A Figg, Larry Michael Cass, Jake Williams and others
Defendant:
The City of Fontana, The City of Fontana, California Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Type:
Torts - Injury
Jumah Abdullahi Moore Ali v. C. Matthews, et al
as 09-15910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, AKA Jumah Thomas Moore Abdullahi Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
C. MATTHEWS, SVSP Nurse, M. ARROYO, SVSP Nurse and C. VOGEL-PACE, SVSP Nurse
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
David Wilson v. K. Wann, et al
as 08-17633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
K. WANN, JAMES E. TILTON, E. ARNOLD and others
Jumah Abdullahi Thomas Ali v. Sacramento County, et al
as 08-17057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, AKA Jumah Thomas Moore Abdullahi Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LOU BLANAS, Sheriff, CONTINI, Sergeant and others
Thomas Moore v. John Marshall
as 5:2007cv01481
Petitioner:
Thomas Moore
Respondent:
John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Marshall et al
as 2:2007cv02256
Petitioner:
Thomas Moore
Respondent:
John Marshall and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCornell v. Cruz et al
as 3:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
Dennis A McCornell
Defendant:
Cruz, Brown, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Thomas, et al.
as 1:2006cv02105
Plaintiff:
Jumah Ali-Thomas Moore
Defendant:
L. Baez , L. Zamora , C. Tsai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
