Cases 51 - 60 of 466
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Don Marc Elk, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01503
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and Jessie James Davis IV
Defendant:
Don Marc Elk, LLC and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. SFV Portfolio-9010 Tobias Owner, LP et al
as 2:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
SFV PORTFOLIO - 9010 TOBIAS OWNER, LP, OAK9 PORTFOLIO OWNER, LP, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African Asian Abilities Club et al v. Peerless Building Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
PEERLESS BUILDING CORPORATION, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. 262 N Los Robles, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
262 N LOS ROBLES, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Prospect Apartments Investors LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
PROSPECT APARTMENTS INVESTORS LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. 700 Locust Street Owner, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01340
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
700 LOCUST STREET OWNER, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Saticoy Gardens-93, A California Limited Partnership et al
as 2:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
SATICOY GARDENS - 93, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Saticoy Gardens-93, A California Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. The 1994 11th Street Partners, LP et al
as 2:2021cv10027
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
THE 1994 11TH STREET PARTNERS, L.P., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, The 1994 11th Street Partners, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Landing Property Investments LLC et al
as 2:2021cv10028
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
LANDING PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Palani Group No. 6, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv10041
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African-Asian Abilities Club
Defendant:
PALANI GROUP #6, LLC, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,, Palani Group No. 6, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
