Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Rathburn v. Indymac Mortgage Services et al
as 9:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Rathbun
Defendant:
Indymac Mortgage Services, One West Bank, FSB and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Marina Read v. Denise De Bellefeuille et al
as 2:2012cv02662
Defendant:
Gary M. Blair, Deputy R. Clarke, DDS Legal Support and others
Plaintiff:
Marina Read
Bernadette Alabanza v. Express Capital Lending et al
as 2:2012cv02107
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Alabanza
Defendant:
Michael Arce, Aurora Loan Services LLC, Commonwealth Land Title and others
Mario Jimenez v. One West Bank FSB et al
as 2:2012cv02071
Defendant:
All Persons Known or Unknown, Does, One West Bank FSB and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Jimenez
:Mehran: Abarzary & Soheila: Ferdowsi. et al v. One West Bank, FSB
as 3:2012cv00562
Plaintiff:
:Mehran: Abarzary & Soheila: Ferdowsi. and David-Wynn: Miller.
Defendant:
One West Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Mary Benafel
as 12-60012
Debtor:
In re: MARY C. BENAFEL
Appellant:
MARY C. BENAFEL
Appellee:
ONE WEST BANK, FSB and FRED LONG, Trustee
In re: Mary Benafel
as 12-60011
Debtor:
In re: MARY C. BENAFEL
Appellant:
FRED LONG, Trustee and ONE WEST BANK, FSB
Appellee:
MARY C. BENAFEL
Vincent Robbins et al v. ACF Partners et al
as 2:2012cv01247
Defendant:
ACF Partners, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp, Deutsche Bank National Trust Co and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Robbins and Virginia Robbins
Donald Kamela, et al v. One West Bank FSB, et al
as 12-15134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD W. KAMELA and SIERRA W. KAMELA
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE WEST BANK FSB, IMB HOLD COMPANY LLC, Trustee Corporation, its successors/assignees and MTC FINANCIAL INCORPORATED
Feraro v. Impac Funding Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
Rosalia M Feraro
Defendant:
Impac Funding Corporation , Clarion Mortgage, Ron Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
