Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-55674
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-15534
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Mirsad Hajro, et al v. USCIS, et al
as 12-17765
Plaintiff - Appellee: MIRSAD HAJRO and JAMES R. MAYOCK
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, T. DIANE CEJKA, Director, USCIS National Records Center, ROSEMARY MELVILLE, USCIS District Director of San Francisco and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-56548
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56132
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56026
Petitioner - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-55794
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-55541
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Mirsad Hajro, et al v. USCIS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-17948
Plaintiff - Appellee: MIRSAD HAJRO and JAMES R. MAYOCK
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, T. DIANE CEJKA, Director, USCIS National Records Center, ROSEMARY MELVILLE, USCIS District Director of San Francisco and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-17269
Petitioner - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?