Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 123
Natures Image, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 8:2019mc00014
Respondent: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division and U.S. Department of Labor
Petitioner: Natures Image LLC, John E. Caruana, Andrew Fox and others
The Center for Investigative Reporting et al v. U.S. Department of Labor We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv01843
Plaintiff: The Center for Investigative Reporting and Will Evans
Defendant: U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
State of California, et al v. March for Life, et al
as 19-15150
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: MARCH FOR LIFE EDUCATION AND DEFENSE FUND
Amicus Curiae: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
State of California, et al v. USHHS, et al
as 19-15118
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY, TEXAS, , ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, GEORGIA, IDAHO, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEBRASKA, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, UTAH, and WEST VIRGINIA and others
State of California, et al v. The Little Sisters of the Poor, et al
as 19-15072
Plaintiff / Appellee: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: THE LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR JEANNE JUGAN RESIDENCE
Amicus Curiae: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARS, FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, RELIGIOUS SISTERS OF MERCY and others
R. Acosta v. Employer Solutions Staffing Gr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-16493
Plaintiff - Appellee: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant: EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP, LLC, a limited liability company, EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP II , LLC, a limited liability company, EMPLOYER SOLUTIONS STAFFING GROUP III, LLC, a limited liability company and others
R. Acosta, et al v. Seward Ship's Drydock, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-71216
Petitioner: R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, SECRETARY OF LABOR and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Respondent: SEWARD SHIP'S DRYDOCK, INC.
The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR), et al v. U.S. Department of Labor We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv02008
Plaintiff: The Center for Investigative Reporting (CIR) and Will Evans
Defendant: U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
State of California, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al Featured Case
as 18-15255
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Defendant - Appellant: ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor and others
Wade v. Acosta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017mc80170
Plaintiff: E. K. Wade
Defendant: Alexander Acosta, U.S. Department of Labor and United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?