Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Travis Keesee v. USDC-AZT
as 11-71945
:
In re: TRAVIS EUGENE KEESEE
Petitioner:
TRAVIS EUGENE KEESEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Real Party In Interest:
CRAIG APKER, Complex Warden
Brian Anderson v. William White, et al
as 11-16646
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN LYLE ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM WHITE, Complex Warden, ASPC - Lewis Complex, SEAN MALONE, Complex Deputy Warden, UNKNOWN CLARK, Deputy Warden, ASPC - Lewis - Barchey Unit and others
Pierre Fouche v. R. Guttierrez, et al
as 11-55569
Petitioner - Appellant:
PIERRE FOUCHE
Respondent - Appellee:
R. PHILLIP GUTTIERREZ, Warden and FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Complex Warden
Gary Singleton v. R. Guttierrez, et al
as 11-55499
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY R. SINGLETON
Respondent - Appellee:
R. PHILLIP GUTTIERREZ, FCI Warden and FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Complex Warden
Lee Moore v. USPC, et al
as 10-56658
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEE ALPHONSO MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and J. L. NORWOOD, Complex Warden
Wayne Miller v. Carson McWilliams, et al
as 10-15393
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE M. MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
CARSON MCWILLIAMS, Florence Complex Warden and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cedric Jordan v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 09-17856
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC ROSS JORDAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DORA SCHRIRO, Director, FIZER, Complex Warden and SCHMIDT, Correctional Officer III
Jose Fierro v. Richardson, et al
as 09-15914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ABEL FIERRO
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARDSON, #532, Grievance Co, SANDRA PERFETTO, Supervisor, LANCE R. HETMER, Warden and others
Mark Tannenbaum v. State of Arizona, et al
as 08-16832
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK IRA TANNENBAUM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, BERRY, CO IV, ASPC - East Unit, CHAVEZ, CO II, ASPC - East Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
