Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Martin Murray v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., et al
as 14-80029
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MARTIN MURRAY
Defendant - Respondent:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. and ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Yonezawa v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Paula Yonezawa
Defendant:
Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
ITT Corporation and Gould Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Ametek, Inc. , Anchor Darling Valve Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
State Farm General Insurance Company v. Electrolux Home Products Inc et al
as 8:2013cv01556
Defendant:
Does and Electrolux Home Products Inc
Plaintiff:
State Farm General Insurance Company
Perlongo v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 3:2013cv03961
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Perlongo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOPA Insurance Company v. Electrolux North America Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01011
Defendant:
Does, Electrolux Home Products Inc, Electrolux North America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
TOPA Insurance Company
Liem v. Electrolux, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
Ronald Liem
Defendant:
Electrolux, Inc. , Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and Electrolux North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Michelle McGowan v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 2:2013cv02339
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products Inc
Plaintiff:
Michelle McGowan
Sparks Landen v. Electrolux Home Products Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01033
Defendant:
Carlsons Appliances Inc, Does and Electrolux Home Products Inc
Plaintiff:
Sparks Landen
Gaither Ward v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 2:2012cv10490
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, A B B Inc, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gaither Ward
Shawn Roberts et al v. Electrolux Home Products Inc
as 8:2012cv01644
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products Inc
Plaintiff:
Nicole Horton and Shawn Roberts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
