Cases 61 - 70 of 429
Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
as 2:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Eric Malone
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Michael Cota v. John Malone, et al
as 22-15151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL COTA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN MALONE, THOMAS M. GREGORY, DOUGLAS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
David E. Malone v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00171
Petitioner:
David E. Malone
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Eric Malone v. Toyota Motor Sales
as 5:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Eric Malone
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Cota v. USDC-NVR
as 22-70003
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MICHAEL COTA, JOHN MALONE, THOMAS M. GREGORY and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL COTA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Katherine Finger v. Discovery, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv09799
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Discovery, Inc., Robert R. Beck, Robert L. Johnson and others
Nicole Denise Griggs v. Cottage Health/Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital et al
as 2:2021cv09821
Plaintiff:
Nicole Denise Griggs
Defendant:
Cottage Health/Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Goleta Cottage Hospital, Travis J. Mellon DO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Benny Gonzalez Juarez v. Xavier Becerra et al
as 5:2021cv02025
Plaintiff:
Benny Gonzalez Juarez
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Gavin Newsom, Gary D. Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benny Gonzalez Juarez v. Xavier Becerra et al
as 5:2021mc00015
Plaintiff:
Benny Gonzalez Juarez
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Gavin Newsom, Gary D. Saenz and others
(PC) Gebrezgie v. Phillips et al
as 1:2021cv01626
Plaintiff:
Yohannes Gebrezgie
Defendant:
K. Phillips, K. Matta, V. Marmolejo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
