Cases 61 - 70 of 87
NRDC, et al v. South Coast Air Quality Manage, et al
as 09-57064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., a non-profit corporation, COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT, a California non-profit corporation, COALITION FOR A SAFE ENVIRONMENT, a California non-profit corporation and others
Intervenor:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO., WALNUT CREEK ENERGY LLC, LOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and BARRY WALLERSTEIN, Executive Officer
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Corey, et al
as 1:2009cv02234
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, Redwood County Minnesota Corn and Soybeans Growers, Penny Newman Grain, Inc. and others
Defendant:
James N. Goldstene, Mary D. Nichols, Daniel Sperling and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Oregon, Brazillian Sugar Cane Industry Association (UNICA), Oregon Petroleum Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pacific Merchant Shipping Asso v. James Goldstene, et al
as 09-17765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PACIFIC MERCHANT SHIPPING ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR, INC. and SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Pacific Merchant Shipping Assc v. James Goldstene, et al
as 09-80145
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
PACIFIC MERCHANT SHIPPING ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Respondent:
JAMES GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Respondent:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR, INC. and SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
NRDC, et al v. Gary Locke, et al
as 09-16796
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and PACIFIC MARINE CONSERVATION COUNCIL, INC.
Intervenor - Appellee:
MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
Applicant-in-intervention - Appellant:
WEST COAST SEAFOOD PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION
NRDC, et al v. West Coast Seafood Processors, et al
as 09-16245
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. and PACIFIC MARINE CONSERVATION COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY LOCKE, Secretary of Commerce, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
Applicant-in-intervention - Appellant:
WEST COAST SEAFOOD PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION
NRDC v. EPA
as 09-71404
Petitioner:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Salazar et al
as 3:2009cv01658
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, Rowan Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Federal Maritime Commission et al
as 2:2008cv07436
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Federal Maritime Commission and Karen V. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Save San Onofre Coalition et al v. Gutierrez et al
as 3:2008cv01470
Plaintiff:
Save San Onofre Coalition, California Coastal Protection Network, California State Parks Foundation and others
Defendant:
Carlos Gutierrez, James Balsiger, Dirk Kempthorne and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
