Cases 61 - 70 of 168
State of California et al v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv00682
Defendant:
Seema Verma, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Plaintiff:
State of California, District of Columbia, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant:
DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant:
DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae:
FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
Robert Johnson v. Performant Recovery, Inc., et al
as 20-15022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PERFORMANT RECOVERY, INC., STATE OF NEW YORK, Department of Taxation & Finance, ADAM QUINTAL and others
State of Washington v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2019cv02043
Defendant:
Matthew T Albence, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
State of Washington
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Law Scholars, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Nikolas Bowie and others
Petitioner:
Oregon Immigrants' Rights Organizations
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Sierra Club, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17501
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17502
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae:
ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-56377
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
