Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15920
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Appellant:
CBC, INC.
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15916
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Appellant:
ALEX MARTINEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
In re: Julius Dunsmore, et al v. LG Display Co., et al
as 13-15915
Defendant / Appellee:
EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Appellant:
JULIUS DUNMORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
The State of California et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 3:2012cv05231
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd. and Hitachi America, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff:
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant:
Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
The State of California et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05229
Plaintiff:
The State of California , The State of Arizona , The State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation and Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv05281
Plaintiff:
James Bryan , Jeffrey Ijams , William King and others
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
-FFM J. Doe et al v. Astellas Pharma, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv07695
Defendant:
Astellas Pharma U.S., Inc., Astellas Pharma, Inc., Astellas U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Commonwealth of Virginia, District of Columbia and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
