Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Riot Games, Inc. v. Uniloc USA, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01050
Plaintiff:
Riot Games, Inc.
Defendant:
Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. and Uniloc USA, Inc.
Nutanix, Inc v. Uniloc USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv03181
Plaintiff:
Nutanix, Inc
Defendant:
Uniloc USA, Inc. and UNILOC Luxembourg S.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ZenPayroll, Inc., dba Gusto v. Uniloc USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03105
Plaintiff:
ZenPayroll, Inc., dba Gusto
Defendant:
Uniloc USA, Inc. and UNILOC Luxembourg S.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Uniloc USA Inc and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
Defendant:
Cisco Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Uniloc Luxembourg SA et al v. Pulse Systems Inc
as 2:2013cv03246
Defendant:
Pulse Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Uniloc Luxembourg SA and Uniloc USA Inc
Uniloc Luxembourg SA et al v. eClinical Works LLC
as 2:2013cv03244
Consol Defendant:
Pulse Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Uniloc Luxembourg SA and Uniloc USA Inc
Defendant:
eClinical Works LLC
Symantec Corporation et al v. Uniloc USA Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01483
Counter Defendant:
Symantec Corporation and Xtreamlok Pty
Plaintiff:
Symantec Corporation and Xtreamlok Pty
Counter Claimant:
Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited, Uniloc Corporation Pty Limited and Uniloc USA Inc
Defendant:
Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited, Uniloc Corporation Pty Limited and Uniloc USA Inc
Macrovision Corporation v. Uniloc USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01447
Plaintiff:
Macrovision Corporation, Macrovision Corporation and Macrovision Corporation
Defendant:
Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Macrovision Corporation v. Uniloc USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01447
Plaintiff:
Macrovision Corporation, Macrovision Corporation and Macrovision Corporation
Defendant:
Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
