Cases 71 - 80 of 84
Tyrus Collins et al v. Cargill Meat Logistic Solutions Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01422
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Logistic Solutions Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Tyrus Collins and James Greer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009at00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Barbosa v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., et al.
as 1:2008cv00605
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solution Corp., Cargill Meat Solution Corp., Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Barbosa
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., d/b/a Beef PAckers, Inc.
as 1:2008at00237
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., d/b/a Beef PAckers, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., d/b/a Beef PAckers, Inc., Cargill Meat Solutions Corp., d/b/a Beef PAckers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Barbosa
as 1:2008at00218
Plaintiff:
Christina Barbosa
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States of America v. AC Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv06881
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
AC Products, Inc., A.G. Layne, Inc., AdvancePCS Holding Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Esmond v. Cargill Inc
as 3:2007cv05037
Plaintiff:
Joe Esmond
Defendant:
Cargill Inc and Cargill Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Salcido et al v. Beef Packers, Inc. et al
as 1:2007at00474
Plaintiff:
Santos Salcido and Guadalupe Alvarez
Defendant:
Beef Packers, Inc. and Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
