Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 196
State of California et al v Wheeler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae: Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner: National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00682
Defendant: Seema Verma, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Plaintiff: State of California, District of Columbia, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant: SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of State et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant: United States Department of Commerce, Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. State Department and others
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
DeVinney, DDS v. Delta Dental Plan Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08258
Defendant: DeltaCare USA, Delta Dental of Wisconsin, Delta Dental of Idaho and others
Plaintiff: Jacob DeVinney, DDS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Mells v. Delta Dental Plans Association et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv08182
Defendant: Delta Dental of Wisconsin, Delta Dental Plans Association, Delta Dental Plan of West Virginia, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Robin Lambert Mells
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Jacob DeVinney, DDS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
William G. Stephens v. Delta Dental Plans Association et al
as 2:2019cv10576
Defendant: Delta Dental of Wisconsin, Delta Dental of the District of Columbia, Delta Dental Plan of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56377
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?