Cases 71 - 80 of 163
Wilcock v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02101
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Patrick Edward Wilcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ayala v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02093
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Omar Ayala
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clemons v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02071
Plaintiff:
DeMarian Clemons
Defendant:
Gentry and Nurse Sonya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harsh v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02069
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Thomas Harsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann v. Williams Sr et al
as 2:2017cv02018
Defendant:
Jo Gentry and Bryant Williams Sr
Plaintiff:
Kelvin L Spann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Foster et al
as 2:2017cv02005
Defendant:
Foster, Jo Gentry, Tonya Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Shellery Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes Jr v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01980
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Lafayette D Holmes Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rule v. Sonya et al
as 2:2017cv01845
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, James Dzurenda, Jo Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vontress v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01791
Defendant:
Frank Dreeson, Jo Gentry, Rhoshonda Smith and others
Plaintiff:
George Leslie Vontress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schachter v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01766
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Marc Paul Schachter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
