Cases 71 - 80 of 309
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06246
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Juan Gerardo Martinez-Reyes v. Dennis H. Burns et al
as 2:2008cv06039
Petitioner:
Juan Gerardo Martinez-Reyes
Respondent:
Dennis H. Burns, Rod Penner, Brian Demore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Minas Minasyan v. Michael B. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv05874
Petitioner:
Minas Minasyan and Minas Minasyan
Respondent:
Michael B. Mukasey, Robert S. Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff and others
Defendant:
Minas Minasyan
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv04216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv04218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lu v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2008cv04194
Plaintiff:
Yubin Lu
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen, Christina Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rothery et al v Blanas et al
as 2:2008cv02064
Plaintiff:
James Rothery, James Rothery and Andrea Hoffman
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Lou Blanas, John McGinnis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
