Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Hinkley v. Russell et al
as 3:2013cv05178
Plaintiff:
James M Hinkley
Defendant:
Scott Russell, Kerry Arlow, Tony Dunnington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hankerson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv05182
Plaintiff:
Cullen M. Hankerson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Bernie Warner , Robert McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Hardie v. Russell et al
as 3:2013cv05152
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L Hardie
Defendant:
Scott Russell, Eric Hernandez, Frank Longano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Dunomes v. USDC-WAWTA
as 13-70705
:
In re: LARRY DARNELL DUNOMES
Petitioner:
LARRY DARNELL DUNOMES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, TACOMA
Real Party In Interest:
SCOTT RUSSELL
Young v. Russell et al
as 3:2013cv05079
Plaintiff:
Ricky Anthony Young
Defendant:
Scott Russell, Dan White, Jean Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkley v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05969
Plaintiff:
James M Hinkley
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Scott Russell, Kerry Arlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bing Yu v. Scott Russell
as 12-35913
Petitioner - Appellant:
BING YU
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT RUSSELL, Superintendent
Madsen v. Gregoire et al
as 3:2012cv05928
Plaintiff:
Kurt Madsen
Defendant:
Christine Gregoire, Sam Reed, Bernard Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wootton v. Washington Correction Center et al
as 3:2012cv05838
Plaintiff:
Robert W Wootton
Defendant:
Washington Correction Center, Scott Russell, Food Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Russell
as 3:2012cv05645
Petitioner:
Adam Davis
Respondent:
Scott Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
