Cases 71 - 80 of 5,446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06583
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rogers v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-4692
Defendant:
HARDER, Medical Assistant (MA) at SCCC, FREDRICK, Grievance Program Manager (GPM) at DOC, MAINIO, Captain (CPT) at SCCC and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL ROGERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01570
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reem Yassen Albayae v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2024cv01658
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Director UR M JADDOU, Trung Vo and others
Plaintiff:
REEM YASSEN ALBAYAE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06378
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Storm v. Newsom et al
as 1:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Z. Storm
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, B. Phillips, California Secretary of the CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rawls v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-4646
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Plaintiff:
JASON M. RAWLS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
