Cases 71 - 80 of 122
Randall Pittman v. Adminstrative Review Board, et al
as 17-71238
Petitioner:
RANDALL PITTMAN
Respondent:
ADMINSTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and DIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Marc Cella v. Cargotec Services USA, et al
as 17-70998
Petitioner:
MARC CELLA
Respondent:
CARGOTEC SERVICES USA, SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM and others
Power Constructors, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Power Constructors, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
L-3 Communications, et al v. Loni Leon, et al
as 17-70622
Petitioner:
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
LONI LEON, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM and others
Wade v. Perez, et al.
as 2:2016cv02354
Plaintiff:
E. K. Wade
Defendant:
Thomas Perez, U.S. Department of Labor, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mission Essential Personnel, et al v. Tanveer Khan, et al
as 16-72757
Petitioner:
MISSION ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL, LLC and ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
TANVEER KHAN, TORRES ADVANCED ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, LLC, THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chugach Management Services, et al v. Edwin Jetnil, et al
as 15-72873
Petitioner:
CHUGACH MANAGEMENT SERVICES and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
EDWIN JETNIL, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Vortex Marine Construction, et al v. Terry Grimm, et al
as 15-72258
Petitioner:
VORTEX MARINE CONSTRUCTION, employer and SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION, Insurance Carrier
Respondent:
TERRY GRIMM, GENERAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
