Cases 81 - 90 of 183
USA v. Gualberto Guzman
as 13-56111
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GUALBERTO ALONSO GUZMAN, AKA Gualberto Alonso, AKA Gualberto Alonzo, AKA Alsonso Gualberto, AKA Alberto Guzman, AKA Francisco Mesa, AKA Jose Garcia Parra
Jose Flores v. Michael McDonald
as 13-55900
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE GARCIA FLORES
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCDONALD
Jose Garcia v. Fisher Properties LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00959
Defendant:
Does and Fisher Properties LLC
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Jose Garcia v. Fisher Properties LLC et al
as 2:2013cv03645
Defendant:
Does and Fisher Properties LLC
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
DHINTEC, Inc. v. Jose Garcia, et al
as 13-55693
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DHINTEC, INC.
Defendant:
JOSE GARCIA
Defendant - Appellant:
SALVADOR PARTIDA
DHINTEC, Inc. v. Jose Garcia, et al
as 13-55693
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DHINTEC, INC.
Defendant:
JOSE GARCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
SALVADOR PARTIDA
Garcia v. USA
as 2:2013cv00667
Petitioner:
Pedro Jose Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jose Quezada-Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71270
Petitioner:
JOSE DE JESUS QUEZADA-GARCIA, AKA Jose Garcia Quezada-DeJesus, AKA Jose De Jesus Quezadagarcia, AKA Carlos Ramirez-Gutierrez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
DHINTEC Inc v. Jose Garcia et al
as 2:2013cv01893
Plaintiff:
DHINTEC Inc
Petitioner:
MTC Financial Inc dba Trustee Corps
Defendant:
Jose Garcia, Doe and Salvador Partida
3Rd Party Defendant:
Clarion Mortgage Capital Inc, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and First American Title Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Garcia v. People of the State of California
as 3:2013cv00916
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
