Cases 81 - 90 of 446
John Demos, Jr. v. State of Washington
as 22-35620
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Demos v. Virginia Company et al
as 2:2022cv01069
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Virginia Company, United States of America and District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Demos, Jr. v. Alex Gorsky, et al
as 22-35590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX GORSKY, CEO of Johnson & Johnson, JOHN G. STUMPF, CEO Wells Fargo & Company and LARRY PAGE, CEO Google, Inc.
John Demos, Jr. v. IRS, et al
as 22-35588
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES MINT, JOHN DOE and others
John Demos, Jr. v. Debra Stephens
as 22-35586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA L. STEPHENS, Chief Justice - Washington State Supreme Court
John Demos, Jr. v. Washington State Department of Corrections
as 22-35587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
John Demos, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 22-35589
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Demos v. Jackson
as 2:2022cv01038
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv05539
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Demos, Jr. v. United States District Court
as 22-35564
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Tacoma, Washington
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
