Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Amero v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gabrielle Amero
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gustavo Alvarez v. State of California, et al
as 17-15062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUSTAVO ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON and others
Jackson v. Amero et al
as 2:2014cv01959
Plaintiff:
Duane Warren Jackson
Defendant:
A. Amero, R Harwood and - Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hakim Ali-Akbar v. Michael McDonald, et al
as 14-15994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAKIM ALI-AKBAR, AKA Fredrick Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCDONALD, BIVINS, D. DAVEY and others
Alvarez v. State of California et al
as 2:2014cv01181
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Alvarez
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections, High Desert State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Solomon v. A. Amero, et al
as 13-17013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT U. SOLOMON
Defendant - Appellee:
A. AMERO, Sgt, S. DOYLE, C.O., D. JACKSON, C.O. and others
Malik Jones v. T. Felker, et al
as 13-16415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
T. FELKER, Warden, D. VANDERVILLE, Correctional Counselor, PEELY, Correctional Officer and others
Ali-Akbar v. McDonald et al
as 2:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
Hakim Ali-Akbar
Defendant:
Michael McDonald, Bivins, D Davey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hakim Akbar-Jones v. M. McDonald, et al
as 12-17727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAKIM AKBAR-JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
M. MCDONALD, Warden, D. DAVEY, R. BARTON and others
Chappell v. Fleming et al
as 2:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Rex Chappell
Defendant:
B. Fleming, G. Brackett, W. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
