Cases 1 - 10 of 8,903
G. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv06603
Plaintiff:
H. G.
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
H. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv06606
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
M. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
J.H. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv06613
Defendant:
TikTok, Inc., Instagram, LLC, ByteDance, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
M. H. and J. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Lloyd v. Genseal et al
as 1:2024cv01117
Defendant:
M. Genseal and H. Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Adrian Juan Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesus Pedrito Gonzales v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv08024
Defendant:
A. Weighill, P. Paez, Jr., J Mendoza and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Pedrito Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIU et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2024cv02041
Defendant:
Los Angeles Asylum Office, UR M JADDOU, David Radel and others
Plaintiff:
JUNHE TAN, RUIYING LIU, JUNZHE TAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02548
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Hina Sandhu and Jagteshpal Singh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nguyen v. Tran
as 2:2024cv02528
Defendant:
Tien Tran
Plaintiff:
Quoc H. Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
R. C. et al v. Walmart Inc.
as 5:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
K. B., R. C. and C. H.
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
