Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Coffman v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08646
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Martha J. Demski, William W. Ericson and others
Tran v. Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08417
Plaintiff:
Tran Tran
Defendant:
Adamas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Neil F. Mcfarlane, David L. Mahoney and others
Charles Ortego, et al v. Lummi Island Scenic Estates Co, et al
as 17-35372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. ORTEGO, JOHN S. APOLIS, VICTOR D. ARMFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUMMI ISLAND SCENIC ESTATES COMMUNITY CLUB, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation, MARK R. SEXTON, individual, DOUGLAS CASH, individual and others
Charles Ortego, et al v. Lummi Island Scenic Estates Co, et al
as 17-35337
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES E. ORTEGO, JOHN S. APOLIS, VICTOR D. ARMFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LUMMI ISLAND SCENIC ESTATES COMMUNITY CLUB, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation, MARK R. SEXTON, individual, DOUGLAS CASH, individual and others
Charles Ortego, et al v. Lummi Island Scenic Estates Co, et al
as 17-35030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES E. ORTEGO, JOHN S. APOLIS, VICTOR D. ARMFIELD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LUMMI ISLAND SCENIC ESTATES COMMUNITY CLUB, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation, MARK R. SEXTON, individual, MARK R. SEXTON, individual and others
Ortego et al v Lummi Island Scenic Estates Community Club, Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01840
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Ortego , John S. Apolis , Victor D. Armfield and others
Defendant:
Lummi Island Scenic Estates Community Club, Inc., Mark R. Sexton, Douglas Cash and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Stephenson v. J. Gronolsky, et al
as 10-70058
Petitioner:
DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON
Respondent:
J. GRONOLSKY, HARLEY LAPPIN, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
