Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Barbara Trevino v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Barbara Trevino
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com International, Inc., Amazon.com LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Marcos Ramos et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ramos, Sahara Antrim, Eldaa Soto and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com International, Inc., Amazon.Com LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Tracy McCarthy v. AMZN, et al
as 23-35605
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACY MCCARTHY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AUDIBLE INC.
Heck v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Julia Heck
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Audible Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
McCarthy v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01019
Plaintiff:
Tracy McCarthy
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Audible Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Viveros et al v. Audible Inc
as 2:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
RENEE VIVEROS and CHRISTINE BIAS
Defendant:
Audible Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Heck v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03986
Plaintiff:
Julia Heck
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Audible, Inc.
Luis Licea v. Audible, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02360
Defendant:
Does 1 - 10, Audible, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Luis Licea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant McKee, et al v. Audible Inc.
as 18-55773
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRANT MCKEE, ERIC WEBER and MICHAEL ROGAWSKI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
AUDIBLE INC.
Grant McKee, et al v. Audible, Inc.
as 18-55595
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRANT MCKEE, TAYLOR FISSE, BRYAN REES and others
Defendant - Appellant:
AUDIBLE INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
