Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv09860
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. George Kridner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv00144
Plaintiff: CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Caremark, L.L.C.
Defendant: George Kridner
Gable Family Pharmacy, et al v. USDC-AZP
as 13-70096
: In re: GABLE FAMILY PHARMACY, HANEY & HANEY, LLC, AUBURN PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Petitioner: GABLE FAMILY PHARMACY, HANEY & HANEY, LLC, AUBURN PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Real Party In Interest: CVS PHARMACY, INC., CAREMARK, L.L.C. and CAREMARKPCS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02095
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Enos v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et. al.
as 2:2012cv02470
Plaintiff: Andree Enos
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc. , Caremark, L.L.C. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Enos v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2012at01308
Plaintiff: Andree Enos
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Caremark, L.L.C. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abbott Laboratories v. USDCOAK
as 10-71786
: In re: ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Petitioner: ABBOTT LABORATORIES
Respondent: USDC, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest: MEIJER, INC., MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC. and others
Rite Aid Corporation et al v. Abbott Laboratories
as 3:2007cv06120
Plaintiff: Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Corporation and others
Defendant: Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?