Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Alfaro Lanzas, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1965
Petitioner:
JULISSA ALFARO LANZAS and WILDYRA CHAVARRIA ALFARO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Chavarria v. Shinn, et al.
as 23-3491
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISAIAS CHAVARRIA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, AND REENTRY, Director of ADOC and MARK BRNOVICH, AZ Attorney General
Victor Manuel Chavarria v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv02095
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Chavarria
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC) Gray v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Gray
Defendant:
Warden, Assistant Warden, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campos Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1226
Petitioner:
BRENDA CAMPOS GONZALEZ, BREYDA ITZEL CHAVEZ CAMPOS and EVERARDO JAVIER CHAVARRIA CAMPOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Vides Giron, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1104
Petitioner:
HECTOR RENE VIDES GIRON and FLOR DE MARIA ORELLANA CHAVARRIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jindal v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Nikhil Jindal
Defendant:
Ismael Rodriguez and Does 1 through 20
Claimant:
Alberta Chavarria
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 Removal of Claims Related to Bankruptcy Cases
Chavarria Gomez v. Garland
as 22-1879
Petitioner:
STEPHANIE BEATRIZ CHAVARRIA GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
(PC)Millare v. CDCR, et al.,
as 2:2022cv01862
Plaintiff:
Moriano Millare
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, T. Reynolds, J. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
