Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 715
Lewis v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-3828
Petitioner: GLEN A. LEWIS
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Aulisio v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-3842
Petitioner: ANTHONY AULISIO, JR.
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Hedges v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3687
Plaintiff: CRAIG JOSEPH HEDGES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID A. HUBBART, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Meenakshisundaram et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 5:2024cv02441
Plaintiff: Ramesh Meenakshisundaram and Meenakshi Muthuraman
Defendant: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Roman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2220
Petitioner: LUMINITA ROMAN
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Roman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-1580
Petitioner: GABRIEL L. ROMAN
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Talbot v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-1280
Plaintiff: SHAWN TALBOT, of the family Rice
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, doing business as IRS Agent John Does 1-100, DEPUTY ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, doing business as David A. Hubbert and others
Zalke v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: Joseph T Zalke
Defendant: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6703 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Cardulla v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-31
Petitioner / Appellant: RICHARD JOHN CARDULLA
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Gentry, et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-4174
Petitioner / Appellant: IRA W. GENTRY and LYNN M. GENTRY
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?