Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 22,865
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by filed date
(SS) Gomes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01640
Plaintiff: Victoria Lee Gomes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00460
Plaintiff: Amalia Terry Lopez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Gonzalez Mexicano v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00461
Plaintiff: Javier Gonzalez Mexicano
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Galitz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05451
Plaintiff: Susan L. Galitz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Galitz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05452
Plaintiff: Susan L. Galitz
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wodaege v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05454
Plaintiff: Abigail Jo Wodaege
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Houlihan v. O'Malley
as 24-3593
Plaintiff: BEATRIZ HOULIHAN
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Walker v. O'Malley
as 24-3598
Plaintiff: JEFFREY DAVID WALKER
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Gomes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at00724
Plaintiff: Victoria Lee Gomes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hanna et al
as 2:2024cv04838
Petitioner: Kamy Hanna and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?