Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Journeyman and Apprenticeship Training Trust et al v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2024at00382
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Journeyman and Apprenticeship Training Trust, Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Health and Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc. and Trinity Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers' Pension Fund et al v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers' Pension Fund, Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Workers' Health and Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Kern County Electrical Journeyman and Apprenticeship Training Trust and others
Defendant:
Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc. individually and Doing business as Trinity Power, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of Joint Electrical Industry Training Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc. Doing business as Trinity Power
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2023at00593
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of IBEW Local 100 Pension Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of Joint Electrical Industry Training Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of NECA/IBEW Family Medical Care Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Trinity Construction Enterprises, Inc. Doing business as Trinity Power
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc. et al v. UMR, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv08006
Plaintiff:
Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc., R&R Surgical Institute, an Unincorporated association and R and R Surgical Institute
Defendant:
UMR, Inc., PCL Construction Enterprises,Inc, Multiplan Audit & Review Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Contract Dispute
Stahl et al v. Skyline Capital Builders LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Kraig Stahl, Gregory Loy and K.D. Stahl Construction Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Skyline Capital Builders LLC and Skyline Construction Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Boards of Trustees of the Cement Masons & Plasterers Health & Welfare Trust et al v. Pacific Coast Construction Enterprises Inc
as 2:2020cv00819
Plaintiff:
Western Washington Cement Masons Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust, Boards of Trustees of the Cement Masons & Plasterers Health & Welfare Trust and Cement Masons and Plasterers Retirement Trust
Defendant:
Pacific Coast Construction Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United States of America for the use of McCann Construction Enterprises Inc v. Swinerton-Absher JV et al
as 2:2017cv00231
Defendant:
Swinerton-Absher JV , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and McCann Construction Enterprises, Inc
Counter_claimant:
Zurich American Insurance Company , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , Swinerton-Absher JV and others
Counter_defendant:
McCann Construction Enterprises, Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
McCann Construction Enterprises, Inc
Defendant:
Swinerton Builders, Absher Construction Co., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
