Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC et al v. Pandora Marketing, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv05486
Defendant: Esq. Miranda McCroskey, Intermarketing Media, LLC, McCroskey Legal and others
Counter Defendant: Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts International, Inc.
Material Witne: BRENT DAVID BARLOW
Special Master: Ret. Victor B Kenton and Ret Patrick J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00554
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gonzalez et al v. Diamond Resorts International Marketing, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00979
Defendant: Diamond Resorts International, Inc., Diamond Resorts International Marketing, Inc., Diamond Resorts Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Daniel Gonzalez and Jeffrey Hughes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Firemans Fund Insurance Company v. Diamond Resorts International, Inc.
as 2:2022cv03720
Plaintiff: Firemans Fund Insurance Company
Defendant: Diamond Resorts International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Type: Contract Insurance
Diamond Resorts International, Inc. et al v. Reed Hein & Associates, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03007
Defendant: Reed Hein & Associates, LLC dba Tiumeshare Exit Team, Trevor Hein, Brandon Reed and others
Plaintiff: Diamond Resorts International, Inc., Diamond Resorts Management, Inc., Diamond Resorts Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv05541
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05539
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Martinez et al v. Diamond Resorts International, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01886
Defendant: Diamond Resorts International, Inc., Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC and Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Members Association
Plaintiff: Ivonne Martinez and Eduardo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diamond Resorts Corporation, a Maryland corporation et al v. Brown et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00227
Plaintiff: Diamond Resorts International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Diamond Resorts Holding, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Diamond Resorts Corporation, a Maryland corporation and others
Defendant: Exchange Points Club, a Florida and Missouri limited liability company, Premier Rewards, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company, Owner Extras, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company and others
Counter Defendant: Diamond Resorts Centralized Services Company and Diamond Resorts International Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamstrs Pension Fund et al v. Diamond Resorts International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01355
Defendant: Jeffrey W Jones, Stephen J Cloobeck, Desert Resorts International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamstrs Pension Fund, Local 705 International Brotherhood of Teamsters Pension Fund, Nantahala Capital Management LLC and others
In Re: In Re Diamond Resorts International, Inc. Securities Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?