Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Edgar Vasquez v. Rentokil North America, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Edgar Vasquez
Defendant:
Rentokil North America, Inc. and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Edgar Vasquez, et al v. Felicia Ponce, et al
as 22-55563
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR VASQUEZ
Petitioner:
LANCE AARON WILSON and MAURICE SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
FELICIA PONCE, Warden and MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of the Bureau of Prisons
Edgar Vasquez v. USA, et al
as 22-55501
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDGAR VASQUEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, FBOP Director / Central Office and others
Edgar Vasquez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv07176
Plaintiff:
Edgar Vasquez
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lance Wilson, et al v. Felicia Ponce, et al
as 20-55760
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAURICE SMITH, LANCE AARON WILSON and EDGAR VASQUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of the Bureau of Prisons and FELICIA PONCE, Warden
Lance Aaron Wilson et al v. Felicia L Ponce et al
as 2:2020cv04451
Petitioner:
Lance Aaron Wilson, Maurice Smith and Edgar Vasquez
Respondent:
Felicia L. Ponce and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edgar Vasquez v. Jeff Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv00688
Respondent:
Felicia Ponce and Jeff Sessions
Petitioner:
Edgar Vasquez
Edgar Vasquez Dominguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-74489
Petitioner:
EDGAR VASQUEZ DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Gubins v. Napolitano et al
as 3:2009cv01636
Plaintiff:
Towalds Gubins
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Lori Haley, Robin F Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
